Mises’ democracy–dictatorship equivalence theorem: A critique
نویسنده
چکیده
Ludwig von Mises argues that public opinion, not the form of government, is the ultimate determinant of policy. The implication is that, holding public opinion constant, democracies and dictatorships will have the same policies—a result I call Mises’ Democracy–Dictatorship Equivalence Theorem. According to Mises, dictators have to comply with public opinion or else they will be overthrown. I argue that he seriously overestimates the power of revolution to discipline dictators. Mises was perceptive to note that, in practice, “dictatorially imposed” policies are often democratically sustainable, but he neglected several mechanisms—all more plausible than the threat of revolution— capable of explaining this fact.
منابع مشابه
Capital and Income in Democratic Socialism
Abstract: Some scholars of the Interwar Debate on Socialism argue that the trial and error method developed by Taylor (1929), Lange (1938), and Dickinson (1939) proved that socialism could match or outperform capitalism. Other scholars argue that the trial and error method of simulating markets was an illegitimate compromise between true socialism and capitalism. The market socialists failed to...
متن کاملDemocracy or Dictatorship: The Effect of Political Regime Type on Economic Institutions
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of political regime types, including democracy and dictatorship, on the quality of economic institutions as the main variables in the formation of the economic growth process. The political power is distributed among a wide range of interest groups in mature democracies, while it is concentrated in the hands of the elected executive in init...
متن کاملA General Equivalence Theorem for Allocation of Indivisible Objects
We consider situations in which n indivisible objects are to be allocated to n agents. A number of recent papers studying such allocation problems have shown various interesting equivalences between randomized mechanisms based on trading and randomized mechanisms based on serial dictatorship. We prove a very general equivalence theorem from which many previous equivalence results immediately fo...
متن کاملDemocracy and Dictatorship Do Not Float Freely: Structural Sources of Political Regimes in Southeast Asia
متن کامل
آیا دموکراسی برای کشورهای در حال توسعه خوب است؟
In recent years, some intellectuals have stated that democracy is not suitable for developing countries as it decreases their economic growth. They hold that dictatorship states can better plan for the benefit of their nations because they are free from the pressure of voters. This article explains two reasons to reject the mentioned claim. First, the definition of development has undergone cha...
متن کامل